Cases 11 - 20 of 117
BARNES v. COUNTY OF MERCER et al.
as 3:2022cv02376
Plaintiff:
Atiba Barnes
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MERCER, MR. CHARLES ELLIS, MERCER COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SANSEVERO v. COUNTY OF MERCER et al
as 3:2022cv01977
Plaintiff:
DANE SANSEVERO
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MERCER, MR. BRIAN HUGHES, WARDEN CHARLES ELLIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DEW v. ELLIS et al
as 3:2022cv01136
Plaintiff:
JOHN DEW
Defendant:
CHARLES ELLIS, A+L MEDICAL DEPT., MRS. HUNTLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GOLDWARE v. ELLIS et al
as 3:2022cv01979
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GOLDWARE
Defendant:
WARDEN CHARLES ELLIS, MERCER COUNTY CORRECTIONS CENTER and C.F.G.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COWAN v. ELLIS et al
as 3:2022cv01167
Plaintiff:
TAQUAN COWAN
Defendant:
CHARLES ELLIS and BRIAN M. HUGHES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLACKWELL v. ELLIS et al
as 3:2022cv01308
Plaintiff:
LAMONT BLACKWELL
Defendant:
CHARLES ELLIS, MRS. HUNTLEY and MEDICAL DEPT.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. ELLIS et al
as 3:2022cv00292
Plaintiff:
JERMINE JONES
Defendant:
CHARLES ELLIS and BRIAN M. HUGHES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DEJESUS v. COUNTY OF MERCER et al
as 3:2021cv20233
Plaintiff:
PEDRO DEJESUS
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MERCER, BRIAN HUGHES, CHARLES ELLIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON v. ELLIS et al
as 3:2021cv20161
Plaintiff:
RAHEEN D. WILSON, SR.
Defendant:
WARDEN CHARLES ELLIS, MEDICAL DEPT. STAFF, NURSE NANCY GORDON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON v. HUGHES et al
as 3:2021cv20147
Plaintiff:
RAHEEN D. WILSON, SR.
Defendant:
BRIAN M. HUGHES and WARDEN CHARLES ELLIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
