Cases 41 - 50 of 67
Kevin Brathwaite v. Warden James T Vaughn Correcti, et al
as 14-1750
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN C. BRATHWAITE
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER, DEPUTY WARDEN DAVID PIERCE, CHRISTOPHER KLEIN and others
Charles Monroe v. Deputy Warden, et al
as 13-3202
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES THOMAS MONROE
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPUTY WARDEN, NATASHA HOLLINGSWORTH, Staff-Lt., MICHAEL PEARSON, K-9 Officer and others
Biggins v. Danberg et al
as 1:2012cv01666
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
Carl C. Danberg, Christopher Klien, Michael Deloy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles Monroe v. Christopher Klein, et al
as 12-4287
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES THOMAS MONROE
Defendant - Appellee:
NATASHA HOLLINGSWORTH, Staff, MICHAEL PEARSON, K-9 Officer, BENSON, Staff and others
Robinson v. Scarborough et al
as 1:2012cv01401
Plaintiff:
Gregory F. Robinson
Defendant:
James Scarborough, Troy Thompson, Argawal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Monroe v. Klein et al
as 1:2012cv00723
Plaintiff:
Charles Thomas Monroe
Defendant:
Christopher Klein, Natasha Hollingsworth, Michael Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Runyon v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 12-2606
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES R. RUNYON
Defendant - Appellee:
CARL C. DANBERG, Commissioner of the Delaware Department of Corrections, PERRY PHELPS, DAVID PIERCE and others
Runyon v. Danberg et al
as 1:2012cv00002
Plaintiff:
James R. Runyon
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Perry Phelps, David Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooke v. Warrington et al
as 1:2011cv00986
Plaintiff:
James E. Cooke, Jr.
Defendant:
Warrington, Depp, Perry Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Biggins v. Zeobouty
as 11-3781
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
ZEOBOUTY, GORDON, CHELSIA HICKS and others
Debtor - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER CESSNA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
