Cases 61 - 70 of 146
KENNEDY v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv02338
Plaintiff:
ARDELL KENNEDY
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JAMES KENNEY, RICHARD ROSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Piskanin v. Commonwealth of Pennsyvlania Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv00827
Plaintiff:
Michael John Piskanin, Jr.
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Pennsyvlania Department of Corrections, John Wetzel, Tammy Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tiebout et al v. Shaw et al
as 1:2017cv00509
Plaintiff:
John Tiebout and Lisa Tiebout
Defendant:
Robert J. Shaw, Kelly Evans and John Misquitta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haskins v. Tice et al
as 1:2016cv02002
Plaintiff:
Anthony Haskins
Defendant:
Eric Tice, Captain Harris, Kelly Everhart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe v. Doe et al
as 3:2016cv00394
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Jane Doe,, Barb Doe, Bill Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KEY v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY PROBATION AND PAROLE et al
as 2:2016cv01039
Plaintiff:
ERNEST KEY
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY PROBATION AND PAROLE, MICHAEL P. GORDON and KELLY ANNE TOPELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ASHFORD v. KELLY et al
as 3:2015cv02166
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ashford
Defendant:
THOMAS H. KELLY, Richard K. Renn, Michael W. Flannelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UPSHUR v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2015cv04688
Plaintiff:
ALBERT UPSHUR
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL NUTTER, CHARLES RAMSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ASHFORD v. KELLY et al
as 2:2015cv04174
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WINSTON ASHFORD
Defendant:
THOMAS H. KELLY, RICHARD K. RENN, MICHAEL W. FLANNELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibson v. Snider et al
as 3:2015cv01393
Plaintiff:
Kelly McCoy-Gibson
Defendant:
Snider, Sisco and Gober
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
