Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Michael Keeling v. John Wetzel, et al
as 23-2045
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL E. KEELING
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN E. WETZEL, Secretary, Department of Corrections, DR. JEANNE RIMEHOUSE, Licensed Psychologist/Psychiatrist for the Department of Corrections in Central Office and DR. HOFFMAN, Licensed Psychologist Manager, Department of Corrections at SCI Dallas
Ravanna Spencer v. Secretary Department of Correc, et al
as 14-2009
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAVANNA SPENCER
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ROBERT COLLINS, MICHAEL LORADY and others
Michael Piskanin, Jr. v. Marirosa Lamas, et al
as 13-3338
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL JOHN PISKANIN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MARIROSA LAMAS, LINK, Individually and as Medical Contractor SCI Benner, CORIZON, Individually and as Medical Contractor SCI Benner and others
Lawrence Wilson v. Secretary Dept of Corrections, et al
as 13-1641
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE MARVIN WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and G. DAYA, Medical Physician
Michael Forrest v. Nedab, et al
as 12-3939
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL FORREST
Defendant - Appellee:
NEDAB, HORN, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Feldon Bush, Sr. v. Edward Rendell
as 12-2221
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FELDON BUSH, SR., JAMES HILL and ANTHONY ALLEN
Defendant - Appellee:
EDWARD G. RENDELL, SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LAMAS and others
Melvin Lindsay v. Ray Earlston, et al
as 12-2082
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MELVIN X. LINDSAY
Defendant - Appellee:
RAY EARLSTON
Defendant - Numerous Parties See Appellee:
RAYMOND LAWLER, BRIAN CORBIN, JON FISHER and others
Wilfredo Portalatin v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 09-2242
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILFREDO PORTALATIN
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, Ph.D., Secretary, Department of Corrections, GEORGE PATRICK, Superintendent SCI-Houtzdale, JOHN THOMAS, Commander and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
