Cases 91 - 100 of 3,106
SU v. BLUE RIDGE HOME CARE INC. et al
as 2:2023cv04057
Plaintiff:
JULIE SU and JULIE A. SU
Defendant:
BLUE RIDGE HOME CARE INC. AND TUNJI OGUNMOLA, BLUE RIDGE HOME CARE INC. and TUNJI OGUNMOLA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
MOFFETT v. KRAFT HEINZ FOODS COMPANY
as 2:2023cv01716
Plaintiff:
STEVE MOFFETT
Defendant:
KRAFT HEINZ FOODS COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
DOYLE v. BI-PETRO, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv02029
Plaintiff:
KYLE DOYLE
Defendant:
BI-PETRO, INC. and ZACHARY HOMEIER
Stump v. Acharya Holdings LLC
as 1:2023cv01780
Plaintiff:
Shanice Stump
Defendant:
Acharya Holdings LLC doing business as Popeyes Louisiana Chicken
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Violation of Fair Labor Act of 1938
DOWNEY v. PHENOM PEOPLE, INC.
as 2:2023cv03781
Plaintiff:
GEORGE DOWNEY
Defendant:
PHENOM PEOPLE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
EVANS v. WELLHEAD
as 2:2023cv01663
Plaintiff:
BRANDON EVANS
Defendant:
SENTRY WELLHEAD
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
v. INDEPENDENT KAREBLAZERS, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv04503
Defendant:
INDEPENDENT KAREBLAZERS, LLC and KYLE FISCHL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Enforcement of Administrative Subpoena
McCarthy v. Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency
as 1:2023cv01562
Plaintiff:
Rebecca McCarthy
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Violation of Fair Labor Act of 1938
CRISCI v. BRIDGEVILLE RESTAURANT GROUP, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv01909
Defendant:
MICHAEL MCMULLEN, BRIDGEVILLE RESTAURANT GROUP, LLC trading and doing business as DEE JAY'S BBQ RIBS & GRILLE, MT. NEBO FOODS, LLC trading and doing business as DEE JAYS BBQ RIBS & GRILLE and others
Plaintiff:
MARY CRISCI
MURSE v. MURSE
as 5:2023cv03829
Plaintiff:
ADAM I. MURSE
Defendant:
MARY L. MURSE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
