Cases 201 - 210 of 879
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv18146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
HOTONU v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2020cv17869
Defendant:
HUNTERDON DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER, JOHN DOES 1-5 AND 6-10, STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
BABAFEMI HOTONU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
ROACH v. VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA DELAWARE VALLEY, INC.
as 1:2020cv17018
Plaintiff:
SHEAVON ROACH
Defendant:
VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA DELAWARE VALLEY, INC. and JOHN DOES 1-5 AND 6-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SHEDDEN v. PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY
as 2:2020cv17063
Plaintiff:
JASON SHEDDEN
Defendant:
PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
BATCHELOR v. LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC., et al
as 3:2020cv16340
Plaintiff:
CASEY BATCHELOR
Defendant:
DOUGLAS PERKS, LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC., and LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
THARP v. THE DEVEREUX FOUNDATION
as 1:2020cv15920
Defendant:
THE DEVEREUX FOUNDATION doing business as DEVEREUX ADVANCED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH NEW JERSEY and THE DEVEREUX FOUNDATION
Plaintiff:
TATYANA THARP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
ALEMAN v. HARVEST HILLS, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv14376
Plaintiff:
MARIANO ALEMAN
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-5 AND 6-10 and HARVEST HILLS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
ALEMAN v. HARVEST HILLS, INC. et al
as 3:2020cv14376
Plaintiff:
MARIANO ALEMAN
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-5 AND 6-10 and HARVEST HILLS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
BOYD v. RIGGS DISTLER AND COMPANY, INC.
as 1:2020cv14008
Defendant:
RIGGS DISTLER AND COMPANY, INC.
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BOYD
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
GALLAGHER v. ADAMAS BUILDING SERVICES et al
as 1:2020cv13926
Plaintiff:
PAUL GALLAGHER
Defendant:
ADAMAS BUILDING SERVICES, Peter Chircio and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
