Family and Medical Leave Act Cases filed in New Jersey
ARRASMITH v. SHORE TOYOTA et al
as 1:2021cv08786
Defendant: SHORE TOYOTA, JOHN DOE EMPLOYEES 1-10, SCOTT RICHARDSON and others
Plaintiff: SAMANTHA ARRASMITH
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
ALTMAN v. RWJ BARNABAS HEALTH et al
as 3:2019cv05725
Defendant: COMMUNITY MEDICAL CENTER, ABC INC(S) 1-5, JOHN AND JANE DOE(S) 1-10 and others
Plaintiff: JULIANN ALTMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SHAMBLEY v. ALTICE, USA
as 2:2018cv03115
Plaintiff: TYRONE SHAMBLEY
Defendant: ALTICE, USA , JOHN DOE(S) 1-10 and XYZ ENTITIES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
PHANORD v. SILVER LINE BUILDING PRODUCTS CORP. et al
as 2:2017cv06979
Plaintiff: EMMANUELLA PHANORD
Defendant: SILVER LINE BUILDING PRODUCTS CORP., NATALIE DOE, JOHN DOE(S) 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
FANARA v. COLLABERA et al
as 3:2017cv06065
Plaintiff: DONA FANARA
Defendant: COLLABERA , SANDEEP GORAI and JOHN DOE SUPERVISORS 1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
CHARLES v. CARE ONE LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00706
Plaintiff: MARIE CHARLES
Defendant: CARE ONE LLC , CARE ONE MANAGEMENT LLC , CAREONE AT PARSIPPANY-TROY HILLS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
CARDONA v. VIKING YACHT COMPANY et al
as 1:2015cv06680
Plaintiff: FAUSTO CARDONA
Defendant: VIKING YACHT COMPANY and JOHN DOE EMPLOYEE 1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
BASURCO v. HCR MANOR CARE, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv04534
Plaintiff: CATALINA BASURCO
Defendant: HCR MANOR CARE, INC. , ARDEN COURTS , ARDEN COURTS OF WAYNE and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
TOWNES v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv07792
Plaintiff: STEPHANIE TOWNES
Defendant: WAL-MART STORES, INC. , JOSEPH BIGIO , JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?