Cases 11 - 14 of 14
William Brown, et al v. JEVIC, et al
as 08-4789
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WILLIAM J. BROWN, LYNN D. BROWN, GRISEL CAIRS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JEVIC, JEVIC TRANSPORTATION INC, JEVIC HOLDING CORP and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL T. GILLEN, SUN CAPITAL PARTNERS INC, F. DIXON MCELWEE, JR. and others
William Brown, et al v. JEVIC, et al
as 08-4789
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WILLIAM J. BROWN, LYNN D. BROWN, GRISEL CAIRS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JEVIC, JEVIC TRANSP INC, JEVIC HOLDING CORP and others
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL T. GILLEN, SUN CAPITAL PARTNERS INC, F. DIXON MCELWEE, JR. and others
BROWN et al v. JEVIC et al
as 1:2008cv03341
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM J. BROWN, LYNN D. BROWN, GRISEL CAIRS and others
Defendant:
JEVIC, JEVIC TRANSPORTATION, INC., JEVIC TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC. and others
Cross Claimant:
DAVID H. GORMAN and GERALD PAULSON
Cross Defendant:
JEVIC, JEVIC TRANSPORTATION, INC., JEVIC TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MERCK & CO., INC., SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE & "ERISA" LITIGATION
as 2:2005cv01151
In Re:
MERCK & CO., INC., SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE & "ERISA" LITIGATION
Petitioner:
SEB FONDER, CENTRAL STATES, SOUTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST AREAS PENSION FUND and AMALGAMATED BANK
Not Classified By Court:
JEFF M. BROWN and MICHAEL J. RINIS
Special Master:
LAYN R. PHILLIPS
Lead Plaintiff:
ROBERT CIMATO, DORIS STAEHR, HALPERT ENTERPRISES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
HENRY DOUGLAS HORNE, JR., DARRELL W. NELSON, ZEPH UGWUNERI and others
Not Yet Classified:
AEGON INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT B.V. ACTING JOINTLY WITH AEGON CUSTODY B.V., KUWAIT INVESTMENT OFFICE, THE LONDON OFFICE OF KUWAIT INVESTMENT AUTHORITY, TRANSAMERICA FUNDS and others
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC., RAYMOND V. GILMARTIN, MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
