Cases 31 - 40 of 79
VENICE PI, LLC v. JOHN DOES 1-10
as 2:2017cv03322
Plaintiff:
VENICE PI, LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
HEADHUNTER, LLC v. JOHN DOES 1-10
as 2:2017cv02985
Plaintiff:
HEADHUNTER, LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
ME2 PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. JOHN DOES 1-10
as 2:2017cv01618
Plaintiff:
ME2 PRODUCTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
HALL v. REVOLT MEDIA & TV, LLC. et al
as 2:2017cv02217
Plaintiff:
WALTER E. HALL
Defendant:
REVOLT MEDIA & TV, LLC., RAHMAN DUKES, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
WOLFF v. NEWSWEEK, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv01559
Plaintiff:
BRIAN R. WOLFF
Defendant:
NEWSWEEK, LLC, IBT MEDIA, INC. and DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Fine Line Homes, L.P. et al v. Beiler et al
as 4:2015cv01565
Plaintiff:
Fine Line Homes, L.P. and Fine Line Homes, Inc.
Defendant:
Dave Beiler, Lisa A. Edinger, Sonja P. LaForm and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
ERGOMETRICS & APPLIED PERSONNEL RESEARCH, INC. v. DR. JEFF BERNSTEIN & ASSOCIATES, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv00331
Plaintiff:
ERGOMETRICS & APPLIED PERSONNEL RESEARCH, INC.
Defendant:
DR. JEFF BERNSTEIN & ASSOCIATES, INC., JEFF BERNSTEIN, JANE DOE BERNSTEIN and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
AVATAR TECHNOLOGIES PHI, INC. v. RESIDENTIAL PROGRAMS, INC. et al
as 3:2015cv00006
Plaintiff:
AVATAR TECHNOLOGIES PHI, INC.
Defendant:
RESIDENTIAL PROGRAMS, INC. , TELIO MILO, INC. , GREGORY B. HERTLING and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
ARISTEO v. RAINES et al
as 1:2014cv07689
Plaintiff:
BRUCE ARISTEO
Defendant:
JODY RAINES, WEBMARCOM LLC, MICHELE MOKEN and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
NEUMANN v. BARRISTER HOME CONSTRUCTION INC. et al
as 2:2014cv06643
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM NEUMANN
Defendant:
BARRISTER HOME CONSTRUCTION INC., BARRISTER LAND DEVELOPMENT CORP., ADINC/J. KAPLAN ADVERTISING and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
