Cases 101 - 110 of 1,287
DEFINED BENEFIT PLAN OF THE MID-JERSEY TRUCKING INDUSTRY AND TEAMSTERS LOCAL 701 PENSION AND ANNUITY FUND v. PAYPAL HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 3:2022cv05864
Plaintiff:
DEFINED BENEFIT PLAN OF THE MID-JERSEY TRUCKING INDUSTRY AND TEAMSTERS LOCAL 701 PENSION AND ANNUITY FUND
Defendant:
PAYPAL HOLDINGS, INC., DANIEL SCHULMAN and JOHN RAINEY
DUNDAS v. INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY PLC et al
as 1:2022cv06094
Plaintiff:
LINDA DUNDAS
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY PLC, VINCENT SADUSKY, MARCO SALA and others
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. PATTEN et al
as 1:2022cv05703
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
JAMES T. PATTEN, PETER L. COKER, SR. and PETER L. COKER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
RODEO COLLECTION LTD v. CARVANA CO. et al
as 2:2022cv05778
Plaintiff:
RODEO COLLECTION LTD
Defendant:
CARVANA CO., ERNEST GARCIA III and MARK JENKINS
Petitioner:
Bhanu Phuyel
BELL v. KANZHUN LIMITED et al
as 2:2021cv13543
Plaintiff:
KEYLA D. BELL
Defendant:
KANZHUN LIMITED, PENG ZHAO, YU ZHANG and others
BUSHANSKY v. PBF LOGISTICS LP et al
as 2:2022cv06185
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN BUSHANSKY
Defendant:
PBF LOGISTICS LP, THOMAS J. NIMBLEY, MATTHEW C. LUCEY and others
TOBIN v. MARGIOTTA et al
as 3:2022cv05613
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW TOBIN
Defendant:
MICHAEL MARGIOTTA, PATIENT IDENTIFICATION PLATFORM, INC. and JOHN/JANE DOES (1-5)
PIERONI v. HUMANIGEN, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv05258
Plaintiff:
ALEJANDRO PIERONI
Defendant:
HUMANIGEN, INC., CAMERON DURRANT and TIMOTHY MORRIS
GREENBAUM v. HUMANIGEN, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv06117
Plaintiff:
SCOTT GREENBAUM
Defendant:
HUMANIGEN, INC., CAMERON DURRANT, TIMOTHY MORRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
LAFFOON v. COINBASE GLOBAL, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv05744
Plaintiff:
DENNIS DEAN LAFFOON
Defendant:
COINBASE GLOBAL, INC., BRIAN ARMSTRONG, ALESIA J. HAAS and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
