Cases 151 - 160 of 9,309
Runkle v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00637
Plaintiff:
Charles Runkle
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ervin (Trollinger) v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00638
Plaintiff:
Letitia Ervin (Trollinger)
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hajdarevic v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00636
Plaintiff:
Mirsad Hajdarevic
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Warren v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00635
Plaintiff:
Catherine Warren
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
CHISOLM v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2024cv04929
Plaintiff:
TYREEK CHISOLM
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Mallin v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv01518
Plaintiff:
David Mallin
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
WHITESIDE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv04590
Plaintiff:
CRYSTAL J. BLAINE WHITESIDE
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
GIORGIANNI v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2024cv04670
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH GIORGIANNI
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
CLARK v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2024cv04732
Plaintiff:
MARY KIM CLARK
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
ARMONE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2024cv04736
Plaintiff:
LOLITA ARMONE
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
