Cases 41 - 50 of 1,250
TURHANAJ v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv01336
Plaintiff:
ALBANO TURHANAJ
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
HUNNICUTT v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
AMY LEIGH HUNNICUTT
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
CRAMER v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv01273
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH CRAMER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
CORTESE, JR. v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv01250
Plaintiff:
JOHN A. CORTESE, JR.
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and US SSA USAO NOTICE ONLY PARTY TO ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE AGREEMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Sheaffer v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00490
Plaintiff:
Catherine Sheaffer
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Parsons v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00489
Plaintiff:
Jane Lee Parsons
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
BARBERIO v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
JOHN R. BARBERIO
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and MARTIN O'MALLEY
APONTE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv01164
Plaintiff:
LISA MARIE APONTE
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
CAUDILL v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2024cv01150
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA L. CAUDILL
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Moffa v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00442
Plaintiff:
Alexander M. Moffa
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
