Supplemental Security Income Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 81 - 90 of 498
O'BRIEN v. BURWELL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv05433
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant: SYLVIA MATTHEWS BURWELL and NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff: STACEY ANNE O'BRIEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
RICHARDSON v. SAUL
as 2:2019cv05333
Plaintiff: BARBARA RICHARDSON
Defendant: ANDREW M. SAUL
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
D'AMBRA v. SAUL
as 2:2019cv05327
Plaintiff: KELSON GREGORY D'AMBRA
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant: ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
HECKMAN v. SAUL
as 5:2019cv05290
Defendant: ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff: RICHARD MELVIN HECKMAN
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
RYAN v. SAUL
as 2:2019cv05254
Defendant: ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff: JOSEPH A. RYAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
DELGREGO v. SAUL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv05255
Defendant: ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff: TRACY DELGREGO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
GLATTACKER v. SAUL
as 5:2019cv05253
Defendant: ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff: MATTHEW GLATTACKER
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
LEWIS v. SAUL
as 2:2019cv05197
Plaintiff: TONI NICOLE LEWIS
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant: ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
CIMPOES v. SAUL
as 2:2019cv05198
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant: ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff: MARIA CIMPOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
PATTERSON v. SAUL
as 2:2019cv05211
Defendant: ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff: LEONARD W. PATTERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?