Cases 21 - 30 of 42
ELLERBE v. THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT et al
as 2:2014cv05041
Plaintiff:
DERRICK J. ELLERBE
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
James Judd, et al v. Quest Diagnostics Inc
as 14-3156
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES JUDD, MD
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF CONNECTICUT and others
Defendant - Appellee:
QUEST DIAGNOSTICS INC
Warren Arsad, Jr. v. City of Philadelphia
as 14-1526
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WARREN F. ARSAD, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
ATWOOD v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2013cv07262
Plaintiff:
DARRYL ATWOOD
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JOHN DOE #1 and JOHN DOE #2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ROBERTS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2013cv05238
Plaintiff:
GRACE M. ROBERTS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and TAX REVIEW BOARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PARSONS v. THE PHILADELPHIA PARKING AUTHORITY
as 2:2013cv00955
Plaintiff:
ANGELA PARSONS
Defendant:
THE PHILADELPHIA PARKING AUTHORITY and THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2012cv04319
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
UPSHUR et al v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2012cv03579
Plaintiff:
ALBERT UPSHUR, ESQ.
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, 19TH DISTRICT POLICE DEPT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Carlton Mills v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 12-2286
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARLTON MILLS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and FIVE CS GROUP
Carlton Mills v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 11-3755
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARLTON MILLS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE FIVE C'S GRP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
