Cases 1 - 9 of 9
LAMER v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., et al
as 2:2011cv02895
Plaintiff:
ANDREW ERIC LAMER
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, TRANS UNION, LLC , EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Buchta v. Arrow Financial Services, LLC et al
as 1:2011cv00679
Plaintiff:
Leonard W. Buchta
Defendant:
Arrow Financial Services, LLC and Blatt, Hasenmiler, Leibsker & Moore, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
WEBB v. ARROW FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv05836
Plaintiff:
JOHN WEBB
Defendant:
ARROW FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC, APOTHAKER & ASSOCIATES, P.C., DAVID J. APOTHAKER and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Andrews v. Arrow Financial Services LLC
as 3:2009cv00774
Plaintiff:
Nina Andrews
Defendant:
Arrow Financial Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Andrews v. Arrow Financial Services, LLC
as 3:2009cv00764
Plaintiff:
Holdt Andrews
Defendant:
Arrow Financial Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Dawson v. Arrow Financial Services, LLC
as 1:2009cv00725
Plaintiff:
Barbara J. Dawson
Defendant:
Arrow Financial Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
HOWLEY v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2009cv00512
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS HOWLEY
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC, EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC, CHASE BANK USA and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
PITCOCK et al v. ARROW FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC
as 2:2008cv01038
Plaintiff:
ERICA PITCOCK and JEFFREY DOYLE
Defendant:
ARROW FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DODD et al v. ARROW FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC et al
as 2:2008cv00460
Plaintiff:
BRENDA DODD and JAMES SEWELL
Defendant:
ARROW FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC and GE CONSUMER FINANCE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
