Cases 1 - 10 of 22
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. CHUGHTAI et al
as 2:2013cv00155
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
MOHAMMAD A. CHUGHTAI and AMIR C., INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 U.S.C.A. Cable Communications Policy Act
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. MORONEY et al
as 2:2012cv00596
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER J. MORONEY and MORONEY'S RESTAURANT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
JOE HAN PROMOTIONS, INC v. COOK et al
as 2:2011cv01606
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
CLARENCE COOK and C COOK ENTERPRISES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. DEMPSEY et al
as 2:2010cv06541
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
MICHAEL T. DEMPSEY and DYEDEM, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. ELLESIN et al
as 2:2010cv03361
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
CANDICE M. ELLESIN and KAMRON OPERATING ASSOCIATES, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. NIEVES et al
as 5:2010cv03193
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
MARCO A. NIEVES and REYREY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. CASTANEDA et al
as 5:2010cv02383
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
ANTONIO CASTANEDA and CASTANEDA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. MARKOWITZ et al
as 5:2010cv02384
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
TERRY L. MARKOWITZ, JR. and NORTHAMPTON SIDELINES BAR AND GRILL, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. BROWN et al
as 5:2010cv02385
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
ROYAL BROWN, WENDY A. LORRAH-GEORGE, ROSEANN STOFKO and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. O'BRIEN et al
as 2:2010cv01667
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
PATRICK O'BRIEN and REDHEAD, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
