Cases 1 - 9 of 9
HUBER v. LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC.
as 2:2022cv03571
Plaintiff:
JAMIE HUBER
Defendant:
LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping
NORTHEAST INDUSTRIES LLC et al v. ON TARGET LABORATORIES LLC et al
as 2:2018cv04379
Plaintiff:
NORTHEAST INDUSTRIES LLC and JOSEPH DELUCA
Defendant:
MARTIN LOW, ON TARGET LABORATORIES INC. and ON TARGET LABORATORIES LLC
THOMAS et al v. LOWE et al
as 2:2017cv02004
Plaintiff:
THOMAS T. THOMAS and ANNA THOMAS
Defendant:
AMARA CARESSE LOWE and ALL OCCUPANTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LOWE v. NCO FINANCIAL SYSTEMS, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv01252
Plaintiff:
HAROLD LOWE
Defendant:
NCO FINANCIAL SYSTEMS, INC. , GE CAPITAL RETAIL BANK and CONVERGENT OUTSOURCING
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
SCOTT et al v. SHOPVAC CORPORATION et al
as 4:2012cv01618
Plaintiff:
CLAY SCOTT and SCOTT MAHONEY
Defendant:
Shopvac Corporation and Lowe's Companies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
SCOTT et al v. SHOPVAC CORPORATION et al
as 2:2012cv02504
Plaintiff:
CLAY SCOTT and SCOTT MAHONEY
Defendant:
SHOPVAC CORPORATION and LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Lopez v. Delta Funding Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv00097
Plaintiff:
Teresa Lopez and Elijah Stackhouse
Objector:
Mary Young, Virginia Williams, Murray Lowe and others
Defendant:
Delta funding corporation, Delta Financial Corporation, All state consultants, inc. and others
Trustee:
Irving E. Gennet
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
BOYLE v. PROGRESSIVE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2009cv05515
Plaintiff:
PAMELA LOWE-FENICK
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
COYLE v. LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, INC., et al
as 1:2008cv02121
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. COYLE, JR.
Defendant:
LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, INC.,, ERIK KALLET, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
