Cases 1 - 10 of 26
MARTINEZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv03701
Plaintiff:
FAUSTO MARTINEZ
Lead Plaintiff:
NINE BROTHERS SUPERMARKET, Inc.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
GHALY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv03190
Plaintiff:
AMIR GHALY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
GOOD POINT GROCERY 2 LLC v. UNITED STATES
as 2:2023cv00654
Plaintiff:
GOOD POINT GROCERY 2 LLC
Defendant:
UNITED STATES and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v. GOOD POINT GROCERY 2 LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00650
Defendant:
GOOD POINT GROCERY 2 LLC and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
DE MATEO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv03193
Plaintiff:
NIDIA A. LIRANZO DE MATEO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
FERNANDEZ et al
as 2:2022cv01617
Plaintiff:
JUAN ANTONIO FERNANDEZ and MARTINEZ MINI MARKET 2, Inc.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 202
CRUZ CRUZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv01619
Plaintiff:
MARIA DINORA CRUZ CRUZ and MARIA DINORA CRUZ CRUZ IND. & doing business as EL AMANECER LATINO trading as EL AMANECER LATINO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 202
TERRERO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv01604
Plaintiff:
ENMANUEL D TERRERO and SURPRISE MINI MARKET I, Inc.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 202
Bencosme et al v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv00041
Plaintiff:
Cesar Bencosme and Felix Lantigua
Defendant:
United States of America
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. (1) 1,576 LBS., MORE OR LESS, OF POULTRY CARCASSES et al
as 2:2021cv02638
Defendant:
(1) 1,576 LBS., MORE OR LESS, OF POULTRY CARCASSES, (2) 274 LBS., MORE OR LESS, OF CHICKEN FEET, HEADS, LIVERS, GIZZARDS & CARCASS TRIMMINGS, (3) 650 LBS., MORE OR LESS, OF A BEEF CARCASS & 2 BEEF HEADS and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
