Cases 1 - 7 of 7
BRISTOL TOWNSHIP v. ROHM AND HAAS COMPANY et al
as 2:2023cv01112
Plaintiff:
BRISTOL TOWNSHIP
Defendant:
ROHM AND HAAS COMPANY, ROHM AND HAAS DELAWARE VALLEY, INC. and DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9604 Comprehensive Envir. Comp. & Liab. Act (CERCLA)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv06695
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC., AKZO NOBEL COATINGS, INC., ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9613
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2013cv05798
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, MYSET INVESTMENT COMPANY, CITIGROUP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9613
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. BRISTOL TOWNSHIP
as 2:2010cv05049
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Defendant:
BRISTOL TOWNSHIP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
THE NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION et al v. AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv04259
Plaintiff:
THE NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, COMMISSIONER, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION and THE ADMINISTRATOR OF THE NEW JERSEY SPILL COMPENSATION FUND
Defendant:
AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC., ALCOA, INC., AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv04216
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC., ALCOA INC., AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
MORGAN ADVANCED CERAMICS, INC. v. SAYRE et al
as 2:2007cv04761
Plaintiff:
MORGAN ADVANCED CERAMICS, INC.
Defendant:
AUSTIN B. SAYRE, JR., F. STUART SAYRE, PETER ROZEMA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
