Cases 11 - 20 of 66
DIAMOND FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS v. THE POTTS LAW FIRM
as 2:2019cv05420
Plaintiff:
DIAMOND FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS
Defendant:
THE POTTS LAW FIRM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Angino et al v. Branch Banking and Trust Company
as 1:2019cv01618
Plaintiff:
King Drive Corp., Alice K. Angino, Richard C. Angino and others
Defendant:
Branch Banking and Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GORE v. NAGEL et al
as 2:2019cv14282
Defendant:
DEREK POTTS, BAILEY PEAVEY BAILEY COWAN HECKAMAN, PLLC, K. CAMP BAILEY, PC and others
Plaintiff:
DEBBIE GORE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GORE v. NAGEL et al
as 2:2019cv14287
Defendant:
DEREK POTTS, BAILEY PEAVEY BAILEY COWAN HECKAMAN, PLLC, K. CAMP BAILEY, PC and others
Plaintiff:
DEBBIE GORE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DONCHEVA et al v. CITIZENS BANK OF PENNSULVANIA et al
as 2:2019cv01039
Defendant:
CITIZENS BANK OF PENNSULVANIA and UNDREN LAW FIRM
Plaintiff:
FAITH DONCHEVA, ANTON, FAITH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS, LONDON, SUBSCRIBING TO POLICY NO. SYN-108553 v. CRESCIP FINNEGAN LAW FIRM, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv12247
Defendant:
CRESCIP FINNEGAN LAW FIRM, LLC, CRESCIP LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, CRESCIP FINNEGAN, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS, LONDON, SUBSCRIBING TO POLICY NO. SYN-108553
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CUKER et al v. BEREZOFSKY et al
as 2:2018cv02356
Plaintiff:
MARK R. CUKER and CUKER LAW FIRM, LLC
Defendant:
ESTHER E. BEREZOFSKY and BEREZOFSKY LAW GROUP LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bio-Medical Applications of Pennsylvania, Inc. v. United States Of America et al
as 3:2017cv01457
Plaintiff:
Bio-Medical Applications of Pennsylvania, Inc.
Defendant:
United States Of America , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Richard C. Angino and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States Of America v. Angino et al
as 3:2017cv01193
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Defendant:
Richard C. Angino , Angino Law Firm, P.C. and Gloria Trostle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Whitehead et al v. Stull, Stull & Brody
as 2:2017cv04704
Defendant:
Stull, Stull & Brody
Plaintiff:
C. Mark Whitehead, III , Whitehead Law Firm, LLC and Goforth Lewis & Sanford LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
