Cases 11 - 18 of 18
J. C. Trading Limited v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 1:2011cv00421
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
J C Trading Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MEDLEY et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv02291
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE MEDLEY , JOHN MEDLEY , CHRISTINA BENSON and others
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC., WAL-MART STORES, INC. and TARGET CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DM Transportation Management Services, Inc. v. AccuMed, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00415
Plaintiff:
DM Transportation Management Services, Inc.
Defendant:
AccuMed, Inc., Access Business Group, LLC, Advantage Logistics, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
HAYES v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al
as 1:2010cv00460
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HAYES
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC. and ABC CORPORATIONS I-V
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
LEVINSON et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv03317
Plaintiff:
ERIKA LEVINSON and MARIA WATKINS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC. and WAL-MART STORES INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
VERCELLONO et al v. GERBER PRODUCTS COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv02350
Plaintiff:
KRISTINA VERCELLONO and DANIEL VERCELLONO
Defendant:
GERBER PRODUCTS COMPANY, HELENE CURTIS, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Musson et al v. Galileo Wilkes-Barre,L.P. et al
as 3:2009cv00499
Plaintiff:
Merlyne Musson and Kenneth Musson
Defendant:
Galileo Wilkes-Barre,L.P., Galileo Wilkes-Barre,L.P., Galileo Wilkes-Barre,L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Powermate Corporation v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc.
as 1:2008cv00434
Plaintiff:
Powermate Corporation
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
