Cases 21 - 28 of 28
REPUBLIC FIRST BANK v. FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL.
as 1:2008cv02333
Plaintiff:
REPUBLIC FIRST BANK
Defendant:
FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY and GENERAL LAND ABTRACT COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
REPUBLIC FIRST BANK et al v. GENERAL LAND ABTRACT COMPANY, INC.
as 2:2008cv01010
Plaintiff:
REPUBLIC FIRST BANK
Defendant:
FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY and GENERAL LAND ABTRACT COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
REPUBLIC FIRST BANK v. CIARDI
as 2:2007cv03396
Plaintiff:
REPUBLIC FIRST BANK
Defendant:
LOUIS CIARDI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
REPUBLIC FIRST BANK v. DEUTSCH
as 2:2007cv03394
Plaintiff:
REPUBLIC FIRST BANK
Defendant:
MITCHELL DEUTSCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
REPUBLIC FIRST BANK v. THE M. DEUTSCH GROUP, INC.
as 2:2007cv03397
Plaintiff:
REPUBLIC FIRST BANK
Defendant:
THE M. DEUTSCH GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
REPUBLIC FIRST BANK v. OCEANS BELOW PROPERTIES, L.L.C.
as 2:2007cv03395
Plaintiff:
REPUBLIC FIRST BANK
Defendant:
OCEANS BELOW PROPERTIES, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
REPUBLIC FIRST BANK v. KLEEN RITE ENTERPRISES, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv03385
Plaintiff:
REPUBLIC FIRST BANK
Defendant:
KLEEN RITE ENTERPRISES, INC., MITCHELL DEUTSCH and LOUIS CIARDI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
HAYMOND NAPOLI DIAMO, et al v. HAYMOND NAPOLI DIAMO, et al
as 2:2002cv00721
Plaintiff:
HAYMOND NAPOLI DIAMOND, P.C., ANDREW NAPOLI, SCOTT DIAMOND and others
Defendant:
JOHN HAYMOND and THE HAYMOND LAW FIRM, P.C.
Garnishee:
REPUBLIC FIRST BANK
Petitioner:
BARRY R SHARER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
