Cases 31 - 40 of 80
HUREL v. TD BANK, N.A. et al
as 1:2014cv07621
Plaintiff:
JOHN HUREL
Defendant:
TD BANK, N.A. and THE TORONTO-DOMINION BANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TD BANK, N.A. v. DISANTO et al
as 2:2014cv07191
Plaintiff:
TD BANK, N.A.
Defendant:
PATRICK DISANTO and KEARNY FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SLAVKO PROPERTIES, INC. et al v. TD BANK, N.A. et al
as 2:2014cv05045
Plaintiff:
SLAVKO PROPERTIES, INC. , SLAVKO BRKICH and VICTORIA BRKICH
Defendant:
TD BANK, N.A. , COBA PROPERTIES, INC. , ECP EAST LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
LYDE v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2014cv03963
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE N. LYDE
Defendant:
HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY , AFFINION BENEFITS GROUP, LLC and TD BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ANDRICHYN et al v. TD BANK, N.A.
as 2:2014cv03863
Plaintiff:
DAVID ANDRICHYN and GLADSTONE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
TD BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TD BANK, N.A. v. WALKER et al
as 5:2014cv03178
Plaintiff:
TD BANK, N.A.
Defendant:
WILLIAM D. WALKER , EVE E. WALKER , RONALD J. CONSTEIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TD BANK, N.A. v. VOISARD MANUFACTURING, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv03168
Plaintiff:
TD BANK, N.A.
Defendant:
VOISARD MANUFACTURING, INC. and F.W. ROBERTS MFG. CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TD BANK, N.A. v. WALKER et al
as 2:2014cv03175
Plaintiff:
TD BANK, N.A.
Defendant:
WILLIAM D. WALKER and EVE E. WALKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TD BANK, N.A. v. VOISARD MANUFACTURING, INC.
as 2:2014cv03169
Plaintiff:
TD BANK, N.A.
Defendant:
VOISARD MANUFACTURING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TD BANK, N.A. v. WALKER et al
as 5:2014cv03177
Plaintiff:
TD BANK, N.A.
Defendant:
WILLIAM D. WALKER , RONALD L. CONSTEIN , ELLEN L. CONSTEIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
