Cases 41 - 50 of 88
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv05813
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
PRUCO LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. CLARK et al
as 2:2016cv01540
Plaintiff:
PRUCO LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
JOSEPH W. CLARK and JASON LONG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CLARK v. STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2015cv04276
Plaintiff:
SAUNDRA C. CLARK
Defendant:
STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BODEK AND RHODES, INC. v. CLOTHINGWAREHOUSING.COM, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv03729
Plaintiff:
BODEK AND RHODES, INC.
Defendant:
CLOTHINGWAREHOUSING.COM, INC. and DANIEL V. CLARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Default of Student Loan
CLARK v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY
as 2:2015cv00287
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Plaintiff:
CLARK and ERIC NOLAN CLARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF PENNSYLVANIA v. TRANSAMERICA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2014cv01007
Plaintiff:
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF PENNSYLVANIA
Defendant:
TRANSAMERICA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and CLARK CONSULTING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark Technology Systems v. Scott Gross Company
as 4:2014cv01317
Plaintiff:
Clark Technology Systems
Defendant:
Scott Gross Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
IDS PROPERTY CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. SCHONEWOLF et al
as 2:2013cv06039
Plaintiff:
IDS PROPERTY CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
MICHAEL SCHONEWOLF, JR., JOHN J. SWEENEY, NATIONAL EVENT SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PEOPLESTRATEGY, INC. v. RATHBLOTT et al
as 2:2013cv05593
Plaintiff:
PEOPLESTRATEGY, INC.
Defendant:
PAUL RATHBLOTT and PETER CLARKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
