Cases 41 - 50 of 81
TD BANK, N.A. v. WALKER et al
as 5:2014cv03177
Plaintiff:
TD BANK, N.A.
Defendant:
WILLIAM D. WALKER , RONALD L. CONSTEIN , ELLEN L. CONSTEIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TD BANK, N.A. v. VOISARD MANUFACTURING, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv03171
Plaintiff:
TD BANK, N.A.
Defendant:
VOISARD MANUFACTURING, INC. and F.W. ROBERTS MFG. CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TD BANK, N.A. v. LG INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2014cv03170
Plaintiff:
TD BANK, N.A.
Defendant:
LG INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TD BANK, N.A v. CONSTEIN et al
as 5:2014cv03176
Plaintiff:
TD BANK, N.A
Defendant:
RONALD L. CONSTEIN and ELLEN L. CONSTEIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TD BANK, N.A. v. VOISARD MANUFACTURING, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv03174
Plaintiff:
TD BANK, N.A.
Defendant:
VOISARD MANUFACTURING, INC. and F.W. ROBERTS MFG. CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TD BANK, N.A. v. LG INDUSTRIES, LLP
as 2:2014cv03172
Plaintiff:
TD BANK, N.A.
Defendant:
LG INDUSTRIES, LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TD BANK, N.A. v. CONTROL BUILDING SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv02896
Plaintiff:
TD BANK, N.A.
Defendant:
CONTROL BUILDING SERVICES, INC., ABSOLUTE SECURITY SERVICES NJ, INC., ABSOLUTE SECURITY NETWORK, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BRANDYWINE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, LLC v. QUIGLEY et al
as 2:2013cv02865
Plaintiff:
BRANDYWINE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, LLC
Defendant:
STEVEN QUIGLEY and TD BANK, N.A.
Cross_claimant:
TD BANK, N.A.
Cross_defendant:
STEVEN QUIGLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Negotiable Instrument
HOBOKEN MUNICIPAL HOSPITAL AUTHORITY v. OLYMPUS AMERICA INC. et al
as 1:2012cv02660
Plaintiff:
HOBOKEN MUNICIPAL HOSPITAL AUTHORITY
Defendant:
OLYMPUS AMERICA INC. and TD BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HUGHES et al v. TD BANK, N.A.
as 1:2011cv07257
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER HUGHES and CARLA CRESSMAN
Defendant:
TD BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
