Cases 81 - 90 of 2,382
Peng v. Stephenson et al
as 1:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Leon Peng
Defendant:
Randall L. Stephenson, John T. Stankey, Pascal Desroches and others
Hobson v. The United States Department of State Diplomatic Security Service
as 1:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
John Brenden Hobson
Defendant:
The United States Department of State Diplomatic Security Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Medical Solutions, L.L.C. v. Bear Mountain Healthcare LLC
as 1:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Medical Solutions, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Bear Mountain Healthcare LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Moore v. HUB Group, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Christopher T. Moore
Defendant:
Hub Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Chan v. Jagdfeld et al
as 1:2024cv00182
Plaintiff:
Joe Chan
Defendant:
Aaron Jagdfeld, Marcia J. Avedon, John D. Bowlin and others
Arigna Technology Limited v. Longford Capital Fund, III, LP
as 1:2023cv01441
Plaintiff:
Arigna Technology Limited
Defendant:
Longford Capital Fund, III, LP
Intervenor:
Bayerische Motoren Werke AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Uvaydov v. Fisker et al
as 1:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
Zalmon Uvaydov
Defendant:
Henrik Fisker, Geeta Gupta-Fisker, Wendy J. Greuel and others
Bowling v. Dines et al
as 1:2023cv01392
Plaintiff:
Maren K. Bowling
Defendant:
Daniel Dines, Ashim Gupta, Philippe Botteri and others
Nominal Defendant:
UiPath, Inc.
In re UiPath, Inc. Stockholder Derivative Litigation
as 1:2023cv01385
Plaintiff:
Michael Bernstein, Maren K. Bowling and Hugues Gervat
Defendant:
Daniel Dines, Ashim Gupta, Philippe Botteri and others
Nominal Defendant:
UiPath, Inc.
Al Udeid Marine, Inc. v. Continental Shipping Agency Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01380
Plaintiff:
Al Udeid Marine, Inc.
Defendant:
Continental Shipping Agency Inc.
Garnishee:
Bank of America. N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
