Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Schroeder v. Selby et al
as 1:2022cv00999
Plaintiff:
Holly T. Schroeder
Defendant:
Stephen S. Werner
Amicus Curiae:
Becky A. Selby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Arunachalam v. McNamara et al
as 1:2020cv00959
Defendant:
Thomas S. Hixson, Brian J. McNamara, Raymond C. Clevenger, III and others
Plaintiff:
Dr. Lakshmi Arunachalam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Selby v. Schroeder
as 1:2019cv00061
Defendant:
Holly T Schroeder
Plaintiff:
Becky A. Selby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARL SCHROEDER GMBH & CO. KG v. LESSORS, INC.
as 2:2018cv15250
Plaintiff:
CARL SCHROEDER GMBH & CO. KG
Defendant:
LESSORS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MPR, LLC v. N-FAB, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv01998
Plaintiff:
MPR, LLC
Defendant:
N-FAB, INC. , THOMAS FICHTER, ANDREW SCHROEDER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
John Hancock Life Insurance Company (U.S.A.) v. Schroeder et al
as 3:2015cv00648
Defendant:
Bertrand Albert Schroeder, Damon Bertrand King and Johnathan Vincent King
Plaintiff:
John Hancock Life Insurance Company (U.S.A.)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FRED'S STUDIO TENTS & CANOPIES, INC. v. ALL POINTS INTERNATIONAL DISTRIBUTORS, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv00997
Plaintiff:
FRED'S STUDIO TENTS & CANOPIES, INC.
Defendant:
ALL POINTS INTERNATIONAL DISTRIBUTORS, INC. and ROBERT SCHROEDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
FRED'S STUDIO TENTS CANOPIES, INC. v. ALL POINTS INTERNATIONAL DISTRIBUTORS, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv03818
Plaintiff:
FRED'S STUDIO TENTS & CANOPIES, INC.
Defendant:
ALL POINTS INTERNATIONAL DISTRIBUTORS, INC. and ROBERT SCHROEDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PSI Services LLC v. Schroeder Measurement Technologies Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00818
Plaintiff:
PSI Services LLC
Defendant:
Schroeder Measurement Technologies Inc., ISO Quality Testing Inc. and DL Roope Administrations Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
