Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Ram Buildings v. Alltel Communications, LLC
as 3:2022cv02043
Plaintiff:
Ram Buildings
Defendant:
Alltel Communications, LLC doing business as Verizon Wireless
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
TABAKIN v. CELLCO PARTNERSHIP
as 2:2022cv00587
Plaintiff:
BRAD S. TABAKIN doing business as BRAD S. TABAKIN, ESQ., PC and BRAD S. TABAKIN ESQUIRE doing business as BRAD S. TABAKIN, ESQ., PC
Defendant:
VERIZON WIRELESS doing business as VERIZON BUSINESS GROUP, TIFFANY GREAVES-MCKENZIE and CELLCO PARTNERSHIP D/B/A VERIZON WIRELESS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Joe Bauman et al v. Cellco Partnership et al
as 3:2010cv03142
Plaintiff:
Joe Bauman and Desiree Vaughan
Defendant:
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP , Verizon Wireless Telecom Inc. and VERIZON WIRELESS SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
POWERS et al v. VERIZON WIRELESS SERVICES, LLC
as 3:2010cv02619
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM POWERS , DERRICK FRERICHS and JUST CONSTRUCTION & MANAGEMENT, INC.
Defendant:
VERIZON WIRELESS SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BEACH TV PROPERTIES, INC. v. VERIZON WIRELESS PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS, LP
as 2:2010cv02364
Plaintiff:
BEACH TV PROPERTIES, INC.
Defendant:
VERIZON WIRELESS PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, d/b/a VERIZON WIRELESS and VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. v. HOWARD et al
as 3:2008cv04470
Plaintiff:
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, d/b/a VERIZON WIRELESS and VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. and CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, d/b/a VERIZON WIRELESS and VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC.
Defendant:
WALTER HOWARD and PRIVATE FINANCE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
CALLING ALL CELLULAR v. PAGING CONCEPTS, LTD, et al
as 2:2003cv04964
Defendant:
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, PAGING CONCEPTS, LTD., ADAM GITLITZ and others
Plaintiff:
CALLING ALL CELLULAR, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
