Cases 31 - 40 of 102
Immersion Corporation v. Apple Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00325
Plaintiff:
Immersion Corporation
Defendant:
Apple Inc., AT&T Inc. and AT&T Mobility LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Immersion Corporation v. Apple Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00077
Defendant:
Apple Inc, AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Immersion Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
BIG APPLE INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al v. Z ZONE OUTLET, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv06697
Plaintiff:
BIG APPLE INTERNATIONAL, INC. and SARDER HOQ
Defendant:
Z ZONE OUTLET, INC., HEON YOUNG SONG, Y&S TRADING, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Micro Design LLC v. Apple Inc.
as 1:2015cv00744
Plaintiff:
Micro Design LLC
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
VERIFY SMART CORP. v. APPLE INC.
as 2:2015cv06207
Plaintiff:
VERIFY SMART CORP.
Defendant:
APPLE INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Evolved Wireless, LLC v. Apple, Inc.
as 1:2015cv00542
Plaintiff:
Evolved Wireless, LLC
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
BROADCAST MUSIC, INC. et al v. UVC, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv03185
Plaintiff:
BROADCAST MUSIC, INC. , UNIVERSAL-SONGS OF POLYGRAM INTERNATIONAL, INC. , UNIVERSAL-MILLHOUSE MUSIC and others
Defendant:
UVC, INC. and JOHN GILLESPIE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
LMG 3 MARKETING AND DEVELOPMENT CORP. v. APPLE INC.
as 2:2015cv03069
Plaintiff:
LMG 3 MARKETING AND DEVELOPMENT CORP.
Defendant:
APPLE INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Chestnut Hill Sound Inc. v. Apple Inc.
as 1:2015cv00261
Plaintiff:
Chestnut Hill Sound Inc.
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
BROADCAST MUSIC, INC. et al v. PIECE OF THE PIE, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv01917
Plaintiff:
BROADCAST MUSIC, INC. , SEASONS FOUR MUSIC , EMI VIRGIN SONGS, INC. and others
Defendant:
PIECE OF THE PIE, LLC and JOHN GAROFALO
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
