Cases 1 - 10 of 17
TITCHENELL v. DEFORD
as 2:2024cv01457
Plaintiff:
KURT L TITCHENELL
Defendant:
JASON BRADLEY DEFORD
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
MAULE v. PHILADELPHIA WEEKLY HOLDINGS, LTD.
as 2:2019cv04561
Plaintiff:
R. BRADLEY MAULE
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA WEEKLY HOLDINGS, LTD. and NEWSPAPER MEDIA GROUP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
MAULE v. ANHEUSER BUSCH INBEV, SA et al
as 2:2017cv00461
Plaintiff:
R. BRADLEY MAULE
Defendant:
ANHEUSER BUSCH INBEV, SA and ANHEUSER BUSCH COMPANIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
CEELITE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC v. SEELITE, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv04342
Plaintiff:
CEELITE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Defendant:
SEELITE, LLC, JOSHUA BRADLEY, CALEB JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
MAULE v. WILLIAMS
as 2:2013cv04428
Plaintiff:
R. BRADLEY MAULE
Defendant:
R. SETH WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
EVERETT LABORATORIES, INC. v. ACELLA PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC
as 1:2013cv03529
Defendant:
ACELLA PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC and BRADLEY C. GRAVELINE
Plaintiff:
EVERETT LABORATORIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
PARDO v. ARTISTREE PRODUCTIONS, LLC et al
as 2:2011cv00817
Plaintiff:
ISAAC PARDO
Defendant:
ARTISTREE PRODUCTIONS, LLC, BRADLEY DORSOGNA, CABLEVISION SYSTEMS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
MAULE v. CBS RADIO, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv03234
Plaintiff:
R. BRADLEY MAULE
Defendant:
CBS RADIO, INC. and INFINITY BROADCASTING CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
MAULE v. PHILADELPHIA TRIBUNE COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv00945
Plaintiff:
R. BRADLEY MAULE
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA TRIBUNE COMPANY and ERIC MAYES
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MAULE v. PHILADELPHIA MEDIA HOLDINGS, LLC et al
as 2:2008cv03357
Plaintiff:
R. BRADLEY MAULE
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA MEDIA HOLDINGS, LLC, GYRO ADVERTISING, INC. and STEVEN GRASSE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
