Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Eden Foods, Inc. v. George, et al.
as 1:2022cv00409
Plaintiff:
Eden Foods, Inc.
Defendant:
John Doe an unknown individual or entity doing business as Eden Salt, Earl George, Eden Import & Export LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
TEKNO PRODUCTS, INC. v. GLOVE TRENDS INC et al
as 2:2019cv00091
Defendant:
UNKNOWN ENTITIES 1-10, ALICE SEVAN OHANIAN, UNKOWN WEBSITES 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
TEKNO PRODUCTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
PANDA RESTAURANT GROUP, INC. v. PANDA CHINESE & JAPANESE RESTAURANT, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv11718
Plaintiff:
PANDA RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.
Defendant:
PANDA CHINESE & JAPANESE RESTAURANT, LLC, SAM YANG and ABC CORPS. 1-100, related entities whose names are unknown
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
GAMMINO v. SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv07502
Plaintiff:
JOHN R. GAMMINO
Defendant:
SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION, SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P., SPRINT SPECTRUM, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
BASEPROTECT UG, LTD. v. JOHN DOES 1-X (SUCH PERSONS BEING PRESENTLY UNKNOWN)
as 2:2010cv06806
Plaintiff:
BASEPROTECT UG, LTD.
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-X (SUCH PERSONS BEING PRESENTLY UNKNOWN)
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
GAMMINO v. SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv02493
Plaintiff:
JOHN R. GAMMINO
Defendant:
SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION and UNKNOWN SPRINT SUBSIDIARIES
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 183
ROLEX WATCH U.S.A., INC. v. VIRTUCIO et al
as 2:2008cv04024
Plaintiff:
ROLEX WATCH U.S.A., INC.
Defendant:
JAMES E. VIRTUCIO, UNKNOWN WEBSITES 1-10 and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ROLEX WATCH U.S.A., INC. v. KOLODZIEJ et al
as 2:2008cv02790
Plaintiff:
ROLEX WATCH U.S.A., INC.
Defendant:
LECH Z. KOLODZIEJ, UNKNOWN WEBSITES 1-10, UNKNOWN ENTITIES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
