Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Ramos v. COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 2:2024cv05960
Plaintiff:
Shirley Ramos
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
RAMOS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2024cv05960
Plaintiff:
SHIRLEY RAMOS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
RAMOS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2023cv22067
Plaintiff:
DIONISIO RAMOS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
RAMOS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2023cv03987
Plaintiff:
MARILYN RAMOS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ortega Ramos v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv00791
Plaintiff:
Nelson L. Ortega Ramos
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
RAMOS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2023cv03177
Plaintiff:
YOLANDA RAMOS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
RAMOS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2023cv03004
Plaintiff:
SAIRA RAMOS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
RAMOS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2023cv01879
Plaintiff:
HAYDEE RAMOS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
RAMOS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2023cv00419
Plaintiff:
SUZANNE RAMOS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
RAMOS QUINONES v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2022cv04770
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE RAMOS QUINONES
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
