Cases 1 - 8 of 8
USA v. State of Delaware Department o
as 21-3008
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
STATE OF DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE
Appellant:
ARIZONA CAPTIVE INSURANCE ASSOCIATION, CAPTIVE INSURANCE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, DELAWARE CAPTIVE INSURANCE ASSOCIATION INC and others
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CORAZON
as 2:2017cv13415
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ALEXIS CORAZON, YAMINA CORAZON, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
United States of America v. Robinson et al
as 1:2016cv00891
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Andrew P. Robinson, Kimberly A. Diddle, AKR Family, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2016cv00857
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MICHAEL A. THOMPSON, PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC & GAS, INC., JOE D. HOLLIDAY and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SAFT et al
as 3:2015cv01184
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MICHAEL B. SAFT, JP MORGAN CHASE BANK and FAIRWAYS AT FORSGATE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
United States of America v. Worthy et al
as 1:2013cv01191
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
James C. Worthy, Joanne M. Worthy, Daisy Construction Company and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Harvey Birdman, et al v. Ofc Govt VI, et al
as 10-4189
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HARVEY BIRDMAN, DIANE BIRDMAN, HERBERT HIRSCH and others
Defendant - Appellee:
OFC GOV VI, BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CIGNA et al
as 1:2010cv00014
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
VINCENT F. CIGNA, GERALDINE CIGNA, TD SERVICE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
