Cases 101 - 110 of 24,342
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv06306
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
AVATAA USA, LLC v. YAMINSKY et al
as 3:2024cv06314
Plaintiff:
AVATAA USA, LLC, formerly known as Ahead Start LLC and Ahead Start LLC
Defendant:
FEODOR YAMINSKY, a/d/a Fedor Yaminsky, DMITRY SKRIPNIK, DAVID WILKINSON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
AMMEX CORPORATION v. Buckwold
as 3:2024cv04206
Defendant:
YUDI and YEHUDA BUCKWOLD
Petitioner:
AMMEX CORPORATION
ROBERTS v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY D.O.C. et al
as 1:2024cv05872
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06204
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
KOLINSKY et al v. APPLE, INC.
as 2:2024cv04232
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA KOLINSKY and SIDNEY ROSSI
Defendant:
APPLE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04588
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
HEAT AND FROST INSULATORS LOCAL NO. 33 HEALTH FUND v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al
as 2:2024cv06233
Plaintiff:
HEAT AND FROST INSULATORS LOCAL NO. 33 HEALTH FUND
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, NOVO NORDISK, INC., SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. APPLE INC.
as 2:2024cv04055
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Defendant:
APPLE, INC. and APPLE INC.
Petitioner:
PHV NICOLE DEMERS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
