Cases 141 - 150 of 86,830
HABIB et al v. MAYORKAS et al
as 2:2024cv05923
Plaintiff:
EMAD HABIB, VIVIAN MESHRKY, ANDREW HABIB and others
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and MERRICK B. GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
USA v. Shawn Tribbett
as 24-1857
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
SHAWN TRIBBETT, also known as Marsh, also known as Mellow
USA v. Gregory Makozy, Sr.
as 24-1844
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
GREGORY MAKOZY, SR.
John BuckshawIn re: John Buckshaw
as 24-1855
Petitioner:
In re: JOHN J. BUCKSHAW
Respondent:
JOHN ROSENBURGER and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05898
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
NEW JERSEY BUILDING LABORERS STATEWIDE BENEFIT FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF v. NEWARK HOUSING AUTHORITY (NHA)
as 2:2024cv05883
Petitioner:
NJ BUILDING LABORERS STATEWIDE BENEFIT FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF
Respondent:
NEWARK HOUSING AUTHORITY (NHA)
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
NJ BUILDING LABORERS STATEWIDE BENEFIT FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF v. PREMIER CONSTRUCTION USA LLC
as 2:2024cv05884
Petitioner:
NJ BUILDING LABORERS STATEWIDE BENEFIT FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF
Respondent:
PREMIER CONSTRUCTION USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
IUOE LOCAL 68-00068A-68B, AFL-CIO v. UG2 LLC
as 2:2024cv05885
Plaintiff:
IUOE LOCAL 68-68A-68B, AFL-CIO
Defendant:
UG2 LLC
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
NEW JERSEY BUILDING LABORERS STATEWIDE BENEFIT FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF v. KNIGHT CONSTRUCTION GROUP
as 3:2024cv05882
Petitioner:
NJ BUILDING LABORERS STATEWIDE BENEFIT FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF
Respondent:
KNIGHT CONSTRUCTION GROUP
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
