Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00512
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. LANCHONEY et al
as 2:2015cv01112
Plaintiff:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
MARYANN C. LANCHONEY and MAUREEN A. NAPPI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00285
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
FARRAR v. MCNESBY et al
as 2:2013cv05683
Plaintiff:
NONA FARRAR
Defendant:
JOHN T. MCNESBY, PHILADELPHIA FOP LODGE #5, MAUREEN FAULKNER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MIRARCHI v. MANGAN et al
as 2:2012cv05749
Plaintiff:
RAFAELLE MIRARCHI
Defendant:
BERNADETTE MANGAN, RN , GLENN PELLETIER, MD, ALEXIS PERRI, RN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1101 Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986
JOHN DEERE CONSTRUCTION & FORESTRY COMPANY, INC. v. BRODERICK
as 2:2012mc00060
Plaintiff:
JOHN DEERE CONSTRUCTION & FORESTRY COMPANY, INC.
Defendant:
MAUREEN BRODERICK
Cause Of Action: Motion for Order
BROPHY v. AMERICAN CREDIT COLLECTIONS, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv05975
Plaintiff:
THOMAS NOAH REDSTONE BROPHY
Defendant:
AMERICAN CREDIT COLLECTIONS, INC., AMERICAN CREDIT & COLLECTIONS, LLC, ROBERT M. COHEN and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1691
MAHAR et al v. U.S. XPRESS, INC. et al
as 2:2010mc00196
Plaintiff:
CORNELIUS MAHAR and MAUREEN MAHAR
Defendant:
U.S. XPRESS, INC. and GLORIA V. MORGAN
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Type:
Other Statutes
HAYES v. NCO GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv02389
Plaintiff:
MAUREEN HAYES
Defendant:
NCO GROUP, INC. , SLM CORPORATION and GC SERVICES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01419
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
