Cases 11 - 20 of 39
DIAZ MACHADO v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv04458
Plaintiff:
ALFREDO DIAZ MACHADO
Defendant:
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., BONNEVILLE BILLING AND COLLECTIONS, INC., ACCOUNT SERVICES COLLECTIONS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
TAYLOR v. COMCAST'S CORPORATION EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS et al
as 2:2018cv01230
Plaintiff:
JOHN W. TAYLOR
Defendant:
COMCAST'S JOHN DOE, PAY AGENCIES, CHRISTINA D., MATTHEW F. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
GOLDSTEIN v. CUOMO et al
as 2:2017cv03858
Plaintiff:
DAAIYAH H. GOLDSTEIN
Defendant:
ANDREW CUOMO, NEW YORK STATE, BILL DEBLACIO and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Allen v. Bill Me Later, Inc.
as 3:2016cv02359
Plaintiff:
Harold Allen
Defendant:
Bill Me Later, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. KITSIOS et al
as 2:2016cv04881
Plaintiff:
J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
BILL KITSIOS and ASTERI, CORP
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
GIBBS-SQUIRES v. COSBY et al
as 2:2016cv00768
Plaintiff:
M. EUGENE GIBBS-SQUIRES
Defendant:
WILLIAM HENRY (BILL) COSBY, SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: BOARD OF REGENTS, SOUTH CAROLINA SUPREME COURT and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
TUCKER v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv07175
Plaintiff:
BILL GENE TUCKER
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC, EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC, EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00921
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00874
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff_consolidated:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
