Cases 11 - 20 of 61
Steven Conner DPM, P.C. v. Fox Rehabilitation Services, P.C.
as 22-8048
Petitioner:
STEVEN A. CONNER, DPM
Respondent:
FOX REHABILITATION SERVICES PC
Charles TalbertIn re: Charles Talbert
as 22-2293
Petitioner:
In re: CHARLES TALBERT
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, Secretary of the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, CHRISTOPHER H. OPPMAN, Deputy Secretary for Administration of the DOC, TABB BICKELL, Executive Deputy Secretary for the Institutional Operations of DOC and others
Daniel SheehanIn re: Daniel Sheehan
as 22-2285
Petitioner:
In re: DANIEL PATRICK SHEEHAN
Respondent:
WARDEN ALLENWOOD LSCI and CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER
DeJuan Thornton-BeyIn re: DeJuan Thornton-Bey
as 22-1975
Petitioner:
In re: DEJUAN B. THORNTON-BEY
Respondent:
WARDEN ALLENWOOD FCI and CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER
David Schaszberger, et al v. AFSCME
as 21-2172
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID SCHASZBERGER, JEANETTE HULSE, KYLE CLOUSE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES DISTRICT COUNCIL 13
Virgil RiversIn re: Virgil Rivers
as 21-2332
Petitioner:
In re: VIRGIL RIVERS
Respondent:
WARDEN C. HOWARD and CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER
Bralen Jordan v. David J. Ebbert, et al
as 21-1638
Defendant / Appellee:
BADRISCH, WATSON, Associate Program, T. CRAWFORD and others
Intervenor Defendant:
NURSE JEANA MITTERLING
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRALEN L. JORDAN
STEVEN A. CONNER DPM, P.C. v. FOX REHABILITATION SERVICES, P.C.
as 2:2021cv01580
Plaintiff:
STEVEN A. CONNER DPM, P.C.
Defendant:
FOX REHABILITATION SERVICES, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. ยง 227
Lawrence v. SemGroup Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv02035
Defendant:
Sarah M. Barpoulis, Ronald A. Ballschmiede, Carlin G. Conner and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Lawrence
Thompson v. SemGroup Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv01948
Defendant:
Karl F. Furz, Sarah M. Barpoulis, Ronald A. Ballschmiede and others
Plaintiff:
John Thompson
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
