Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Carlisle v. W.R. Grace & Co. et al
as 1:2021cv00965
Defendant:
Christopher J. Steffen, Henry R. Slack, W.R. Grace & Co. and others
Plaintiff:
Sam Carlisle
CICCOTELLI v. W.R. GRACE & CO. et al
as 2:2021cv02842
Defendant:
DIANE H GULYAS, W.R. GRACE & CO., JULIE FASONE HOLDER and others
Plaintiff:
ALEX CICCOTELLI
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. ยง 22
William Cummings v. Superintendent Frackville SCI
as 20-2636
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT FRACKVILLE SCI
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM BRANDON CUMMINGS
William CummingsIn re: William Cummings
as 20-2649
Petitioner:
In re: WILLIAM BRANDON CUMMINGS
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY DELAWARE COUNTY
William Cummings v. Konyski, et al
as 19-1354
Defendant / Appellee:
SGT. KONYSKI
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM BRANDON CUMMINGS
William Burrell, Jr. v. Patrick Loungo, et al
as 16-8066
Petitioner:
WILLIAM L. BURRELL, JR.
Respondent:
PATRICK LOUNGO, INDIVIDUALLY, RICHARD GLADDYS, INDIVIDUALLY, ED ADAMS, INDIVIDUALLY and others
William Burrell, Jr., et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 16-3215
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
WILLIAM L. BURRELL, JR.
Defendant - Respondent:
PATRICK LOUNGO, individually, RICHARD GLADDYS, ED ADAMS, individually and others
Nominal Respondent:
ROBERT D. MARIANI and JOSEPH F. SAPORITO, JR.
In re: William Burrell, Jr.
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 15-3767
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: WILLIAM L. BURRELL, JR.
Defendant - Respondent:
PATRICK LOUNGO, individually, RICHARD GLADDYS, individually, ED ADAMS, individually and others
Nominal Respondent:
ROBERT D. MARIANI and JOSEPH F. SAPORITO, JR.
In re: William Cumming
as 14-3933
Petitioner:
In re: WILLIAM BRANDON CUMMINGS
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY DELAWARE COUNTY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.