Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Dominy et al v. GMAC Mortgage et al
as 4:2012cv00839
Plaintiff:
Dawn Dominy and Brian Dominy
Defendant:
GMAC Mortgage, Wells Fargo Bank and Allstate Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072
ROBINSON v. GMAC MORTGAGE et al
as 5:2012cv00151
Defendant:
GMAC MORTGAGE and PHELAN HALLINAN & SCHMIEG, LLC
Plaintiff:
SIMONA ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
THROM v. GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC
as 2:2011cv06813
Plaintiff:
DENNIS A. THROM
Defendant:
GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
CRONK v. GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC
as 2:2011cv05161
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH CRONK
Defendant:
GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv06837
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv04138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv03893
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
FELDMAN v. CHASE HOME FINANCE et al
as 2:2010mc00016
Plaintiff:
LYNN E. FELDMAN
Defendant:
CHASE HOME FINANCE, CHASE HOME FINANCE, CHASE HOME FINANCE and others
Trustee:
LYNN E. FELDMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
HARTE v. DEMARCO et al
as 2:2009cv06192
Plaintiff:
KEVIN HARTE
Defendant:
ANTHONY DEMARCO, BIANA TSEPENYUK, DEMARCO, REI, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
LIND et al v. NEW HOPE PROPERTY, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv03757
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH LIND, PATRICK LIND, SR., PATRICK LIND, JR. and others
Defendant:
NEW HOPE PROPERTY, LLC, BRIAN MAMMOCCIO, DONNA FISHER and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
