Cases 11 - 20 of 71
Betel Rosario PaulinoIn re: Betel Rosario Paulino
as 21-1664
Petitioner:
In re: BETEL AUGUSTO ROSARIO PAULINO
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Liliana Cisneros Tunche, et al v. Attorney General United States
as 21-1602
Petitioner:
I. C. A-C, E. J. A-C and LILIANA DEL ROSARIO CISNEROS TUNCHE
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv04238
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Jhon Lora, et al v. Baylor, et al
as 20-3297
Defendant / Appellee:
MR. ARMOND, Sgt. at Monroe County Correctional Facility, LT. BAYLOR, Director of Monroe County Correctional Facility, GARY HAIDLE, Warden of Monroe County Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAMAON WEBSTER, JUSTIN COATE, JHON LORA and others
Jinete Rosario-Guzman v. Attorney General United States
as 20-3284
Petitioner:
JINETE ROSARIO-GUZMAN
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv11146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Keith Rosario v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 20-1986
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY WASHINGTON COUNTY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEITH ROSARIO
ROSARIO v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv03612
Defendant:
CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC and NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC
Plaintiff:
ODALIS ROSARIO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nathan RosarioIn re: Nathan Rosario
as 20-1400
Petitioner:
In re: NATHAN ROSARIO
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL CLARK and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Keith Rosario v. Edward Strawn, et al
as 19-3862
Defendant / Appellee:
CAPTAIN RESTANIO, EDWARD STRAWN, Warden and DEVYN BREESE, Counselor
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER M. CAIN, Deputy Warden, MAJOR CODDINGTON, DONALD E. WAUGH, Deputy Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEITH ROSARIO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
