Cases 21 - 30 of 50
Gerald Howell v. Superintendent Albion SCI, et al
as 19-1780
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GERALD HOWELL
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT ALBION SCI
Rosenfeld v. Esterline Technologies Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv01891
Defendant:
Nils E. Larsen, Esterline Technologies Corporation, Scott E. Kuechle and others
Plaintiff:
Chaim Rosenfeld
Kent v. Esterline Technologies Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv01862
Plaintiff:
Michael Kent
Defendant:
Nils E. Larsen, Esterline Technologies Corporation, Delores M. Etter and others
Thum v. Rozanski et al
as 1:2017cv01638
Plaintiff:
Celine Thum
Defendant:
Horacio D. Rozanski, Lloyd W. Howell, Jr., Kevin L. Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Zand v. DigitalGlobe, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00592
Plaintiff:
Stuart Zand
Defendant:
DigitalGlobe, Inc. , Howell M. Estes, III , Nick S. Cyprus and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00335
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Mobile Services
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Pablo Acre v. Dominick Stranieri
as 14-3266
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PABLO ACRE
Plaintiff - Numerous Parties See Appellee:
IVETTE ACRE, RICHARD ALTENOR, ROBIN ALTENOR and others
Defendant - Appellee:
DOMINICK P. STRANIERI, CHASE MANHATTAN CORP and WILLIAM K. SPANER
Defendant - Appellant:
Y RENT INC, HOMES BY VINTAGE INC, CHAPEL CREEK MORTGAGE BANKER INC and others
In re: Anthony Cook, et al, et al
as 14-1539
Petitioner:
In re: ANTHONY COOK, DOMINIC GALLMAN, JOHN SUTCLIFFE and others
Respondent:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY and STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
HOWELL v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv00573
Plaintiff:
JOHN HOWELL
Defendant:
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
