Cases 31 - 40 of 113
IN THE MATTER OF: SEIZURE OF FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($50,000.00) UNITED STATES CURRENCY SEIZED FROM A WHITE 2008 SUBARU WITH PENNSYLVANIA TAG NUMBER KTV 2238 et al
as 2:2019mc00031
Petitioner:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In Re:
IN THE MATTER OF: SEIZURE OF FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($50,000.00) UNITED STATES CURRENCY SEIZED FROM A WHITE 2008 SUBARU WITH PENNSYLVANIA TAG NUMBER KTV 2238
WHITE v. POMPEO
as 2:2018cv05434
Plaintiff:
HORACE C. WHITE
Defendant:
HONORABLE MICHAEL R. POMPEO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv04238
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
IN RE: RAILWAY INDUSTRY EMPLOYEE NO-POACH ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 2:2018mc00798
Defendant:
KNORR BRAKE COMPANY, FAIVELEY TRANSPORT NORTH AMERICA INC., WESTINGHOUSE AIR BRAKE CO. and others
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY KERR, TIMOTHY BACCO, BRIAN LARA and others
In Re:
IN RE: RAILWAY INDUSTRY EMPLOYEE NO-POACH ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Special Master:
DAVID B. WHITE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
USA/ATF v. White Apple iPhone 8 +
as 1:2018mc00423
Plaintiff:
USA/ATF
Defendant:
White Apple iPhone 8 +
H.W. et al v. POMPEO
as 2:2018cv02934
Plaintiff:
HORACE C. WHITE and H.W.
Defendant:
MICHAEL R. POMPEO and HONORABLE MICHAEL R. POMPEO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
THRIVEST SPECIALTY FUNDING, v. WHITE
as 2:2018cv01877
Plaintiff:
THRIVEST SPECIALTY FUNDING, LLC
Defendant:
WILLIAM E. WHITE
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
THRIVEST SPECIALTY FUNDING, v. WHITE
as 2:2018cv00563
Plaintiff:
THRIVEST SPECIALTY FUNDING, LLC
Defendant:
WILLIAM E. WHITE
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
United States of America et al v. White
as 1:2017mc00499
Plaintiff:
United States of America and M. Acevedo
Defendant:
Ronald M. White
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01934
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
