Cases 31 - 40 of 90
MURRAY DEVINE & CO., INC. v. STOUT RISIUS ROSS, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv05317
Plaintiff:
MURRAY DEVINE & CO., INC.
Defendant:
STOUT RISIUS ROSS, INC., WILLIAM B. HAFER, MATTHEW MISISCO and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836
THOMAS v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv04285
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY THOMAS
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC , EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv04919
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
AMERISERV TRUST AND FINANCIAL SERVICES COMPANY v. FARRO et al
as 3:2015mc00048
Plaintiff:
AMERISERV TRUST AND FINANCIAL SERVICES COMPANY
Defendant:
ROSS C. FARRO, ROSS C. FARRO TRUST AGREEMENT DATED MARCH 16, 1995, MARY S. BERRYHILL and others
ALBRIGHT v. ULBRICHT et al
as 5:2015mc00156
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ALBRIGHT
Defendant:
ROSS ULBRICHT and SILK ROAD
Cause Of Action: Motion for Order
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00686
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Nextel Communications of the Mid-Atlantic, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing Board of Ross Township
as 3:2014cv02409
Plaintiff:
Nextel Communications of the Mid-Atlantic, Inc.
Defendant:
Zoning Hearing Board of Ross Township
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv05844
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv03705
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
WOLFF v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. et al
as 2:2014cv02696
Plaintiff:
BRIAN ROSS WOLFF
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. , BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION and FIA CARD SERVICES, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
