Cases 31 - 40 of 177
Kenneth LewisIn re: Kenneth Lewis
as 20-3450
Respondent:
ANN WILLIAMS, ELLEN E. BOSHKOFF, BRADLEY MURPHY and others
Petitioner:
In re: KENNETH WAYNE LEWIS
Mo v. Kennedy et al
as 1:2020cv01614
Nominal Defendant:
Raytheon Technologies Corporation and Raytheon Company
Defendant:
Ellen M. Pawlikowski, William R. Spivey, Robert O. Work and others
Plaintiff:
Hong Yi Mo
MELCHIOR et al v. VAGNOZZI et al
as 2:2020cv05562
Defendant:
PILLAR II LIFE SETTLEMENT FUND, L.P., JASON ZWIEBEL, SPARTAN INCOME FUND, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D GROFF, DOMINICK BELLIZZIE, SHAWN P CARLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Rene Edwards v. The Hillman Group Company for, et al
as 20-2758
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN CHRISTOPHER HOLMES, THE HILLMAN GROUP COMPANY FOR SOUTH WOODS STATE PRISON COMBINATION PADLOCKS, MARCUS O. HICKS, Esq., (Commissioner) and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RENE D. EDWARDS
Thomas Clauso v. Administrator South Woods Stat, et al
as 20-2157
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY and ADMINISTRATOR SOUTH WOODS STATE PRISON
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS JAMES CLAUSO
Thomas Wood v. Cavello
as 20-2117
Defendant / Appellee:
CAVELLO, Officer of SCI Benner Township
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS WOOD
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv02256
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Dwayne Rieco v. McCreary, et al
as 20-1462
Defendant / Appellee:
GARCIA, INMATE MCCREARY, ISIAH HALL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DWAYNE L. RIECO
FAKE et al v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2020cv01283
Defendant:
WILLIAM H. KETTERLINUS, BRIAN ZARALLO, ANITA N. BOTCHWAY and others
Plaintiff:
CAITLIN B. FAKE, SUSAN B. FAKE and BRANDON L. FAKE
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
In re: Carmen Woods
as 20-1356
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Petitioner:
In re: CARMEN WOODS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
