Cases 41 - 50 of 391
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2000
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01467
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1537
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Thomas Remick, et al v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 22-8013
Respondent:
THOMAS REMICK, NADIYAH WALKER, JAY DIAZ and others
Petitioner:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and BLANCHE CARNEY, in her official capacity as Commissioner of Prisons
Sam Hargrove, et al v. Sleepys LLC
as 22-8011
Respondent:
SAM HARGROVE, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, ANDRE HALL, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, MARCO EUSEBIO, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Petitioner:
SLEEPYS LLC
Vincent Tripicchio v. The UPS Store Inc, et al
as 22-8009
Respondent:
VINCENT TRIPICCHIO, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Petitioner:
THE UPS STORE INC and JB & A ENTERPRISES INC
Thomas White, Jr., et al v. Samsung Electronics America In, et al
as 22-1162
Plaintiff / Appellee:
THOMAS ROGER WHITE, JR. and PATRICIA CAULEY, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA INC
Defendant:
SONY ELECTRONICS INC
Deidre Dennis, et al v. Mylife.com Inc
as 22-1110
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEIDRE DENNIS and WILLIAM BONVIE, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
MYLIFE.COM INC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1109
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
