Other Statutes Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 86
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 408 WELFARE, PENSION AND ANNUITY FUNDS et al v. ENTACT ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
as 2:2012cv07595
Petitioner: TEAMSTERS LOCAL 408 WELFARE, PENSION AND ANNUITY FUNDS and ZAZZALI, FAGELLA & NOWAK, KLEINBAUM & FRIEDMAN, P.A.
Respondent: ENTACT ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
Board of Trustees, Roofers Local No. 30 Combined Welfare Fund et al v. D.W. Griffith Inc.
as 1:2012mc00236
Plaintiff: Board of Trustees, Roofers Local No. 30 Combined Welfare Fund, Board of Trustees, Roofers Local No. 30 Combined Pension Fund, Board of Trustees, Roofers Local No. 30 Combined Vacation Fund and others
Defendant: D.W. Griffith Inc.
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
BRICKLAYERS AND ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICT COUNCIL OF NEW JERSEY AND ITS LOCAL 4 v. BARBIERI CONSTRUCTION, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv06788
Petitioner: BRICKLAYERS AND ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICT COUNCIL OF NEW JERSEY AND ITS LOCAL 4 and BRICKLAYERS AND ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION LOCAL 4 OF NEW JERSEY PENSION AND ANNUITY FUNDS
Respondent: BARBIERI CONSTRUCTION, INC. and STUCTURE TONE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
D.A. NOLT, INC. v. LOCAL UNION NO. 30 UNITED UNION ROOFERS, WATERPROOFERS AND ALLIED WORKERS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv05810
Plaintiff: D.A. NOLT, INC.
Defendant: LOCAL UNION NO. 30 UNITED UNION ROOFERS, WATERPROOFERS AND ALLIED WORKERS , ROOFERS LOCAL NO. 30 COMBINED HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND , ROOFERS LOCAL NO. 30 COMBINED PENSION FUND and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Employee Pension Plan
CITY OF STERLING HEIGHTS GENERAL EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM v. PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv05275
Plaintiff: CITY OF STERLING HEIGHTS GENERAL EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Defendant: PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC. , JOHN R. STRANGFELD , RICHARD J. CARBONE and others
Movant: NATIONAL SHOPMEN PENSION FUND , Heavy & General Laborers Locals 472 & 172 Pension Annuity Funds and Roofers Local No. 149 Pension Fund
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
TRUSTEES OF THE NEW YORK CITY DISTRICT COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS PENSION FUND, WELFARE FUND, ANNUITY FUND, APPRENCITCESHIP JOURNEYMAN RETRAINING EDUCATIONAL AND INDUSTRY FUND, CHARITY FUND et al v. INTEGRATED STRUCTURES CORP.
as 3:2012mc00128
Plaintiff: TRUSTEES OF THE NEW YORK CITY DISTRICT COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS PENSION FUND, WELFARE FUND, ANNUITY FUND, APPRENCITCESHIP JOURNEYMAN RETRAINING EDUCATIONAL AND INDUSTRY FUND, CHARITY FUND, THE NEW YORK CITY AND VICINITY CARPENTERS LABOR-MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and DISTRICT COUNCIL FOR NEW YORK CITY AND VICINTIY UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS AND JOINERS OF AMERICA
Defendant: INTEGRATED STRUCTURES CORP.
BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ROOFERS LOCAL NO. 30 COMBINED WELFARE FUND et al v. RENAISSANCE COATINGS, INC.
as 3:2012mc00109
Plaintiff: BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ROOFERS LOCAL NO. 30 COMBINED WELFARE FUND, BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ROOFERS LOCAL NO. 30 COMBINED PENSION FUND, BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ROOFERS LOCAL NO. 30, COMBINED VACATION FUND and others
Defendant: RENAISSANCE COATINGS, INC.
TRUSTEES OF THE DISTRICT COUNCIL 9 PAINTING INDUSTRY INSURANCE AND ANNUITY FUNDS v. GENERAL GLASS & METAL, LLC
as 2:2011mc00232
Plaintiff: TRUSTEES OF THE DISTRICT COUNCIL 9 PAINTING INDUSTRY INSURANCE AND ANNUITY FUNDS
Defendant: GENERAL GLASS & METAL, LLC
DUFFY et al v. WEBCO CONTRACTING OF ABERDEEN, INC. et al
as 2:2011mc00210
Plaintiff: WILLIAM K. DUFFY , KENETH HUBER , PHILLIP CAPOBIANCO and others
Defendant: WEBCO CONTRACTING OF ABERDEEN, INC., WEBCO INC. and WILBERT E. BAKER
TRUSTEES OF THE IATSE NATIONAL ANNUITY FUND et al. v. BACKSTAGE LIGHTING AND RIGGING
as 2:2011mc00031
Plaintiff: TRUSTEES OF THE IATSE NATIONAL ANNUITY FUND et al.
Defendant: BACKSTAGE LIGHTING AND RIGGING

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?