Cases 61 - 70 of 70
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv07388
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv07608
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
BLAKE et al v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. et al
as 5:2013cv06433
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BLAKE and JAMES ORKIS
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. , CHASE BANK USA, N.A. , JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 260
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01953
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
HANF et al v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. et al
as 2:2011cv06072
Plaintiff:
JOHN HANF and KATHLEEN HANF
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., JPMORGAN CHASE & CO., CHASE HOME FINANCE INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 5211
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv03048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00665
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. v. CANDOR CONSTRUCTION GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2010mc00016
Plaintiff:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Defendant:
CANDOR CONSTRUCTION GROUP, INC. and DENNIS ULVERSOY
SHAW et al v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. et al
as 2:2009cv02461
Plaintiff:
BRUCE SHAW and ARLENE SHAW
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. and EXCEL FINANCIAL
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA v. VOSS et al
as 2:2008cv02057
Plaintiff:
THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Defendant:
PAMELA S. VOSS, JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
