Cases 1 - 10 of 77
Coffman v. RayzeBio, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
Catherine Coffman
Defendant:
RayzeBio, Inc., Richard Heyman, Tim Van Hauwermeiren and others
Taylor v. RayzeBio, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Christopher Taylor
Defendant:
RayzeBio, Inc., Richard Heyman, Tim Van Hauwermeiren and others
Griffin v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 2:2023cv04239
Defendant:
EVERNORTH HEALTH INC., ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, NOVO NORDISK INC. and others
In Re:
INSULIN PRICING LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
Tim Griffin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
KATZ et al v. DELUCA et al
as 2:2023cv01188
Defendant:
TIMOTHY S DELUCA, TIM DELUCA, DJSE EQUITIES, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRYAN R. KATZ and KRISTINE J. CONCEPCION
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv06561
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Stourbridge Investments LLC v. Exicure, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00526
Plaintiff:
Stourbridge Investments LLC
Defendant:
David A. Giljohann, Brian C. Bock, Matthias Schroff and others
Nominal Defendant:
Exicure, Inc.
WHITFIELD v. CONERSTONE BUILDING BRANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv01547
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
CONERSTONE BUILDING BRANDS, INC., JAMES S METCALF, ROSE LEE and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
KOVALEV v. CITYLIFE-PA, PC et al
as 2:2022cv01281
Defendant:
CITYLIFE-PA, PC, TIMOTHY M. PETRIKIN, CITYLIFE HEALTH and others
Plaintiff:
SERGEI KOVALEV
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Kent v. McAfee Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv00109
Plaintiff:
Michael Kent
Defendant:
McAfee Corp., Jon Winkelried, Kathy Willard and others
Han v. Otworth et al
as 1:2021cv01569
Plaintiff:
Han Byung-Gook and Byung-Gook Han
Defendant:
Michael Otworth, Richard Brenner, Tanya Burnell and others
Nominal Defendant:
PureCycle Technologies, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
