Cases 1 - 10 of 29
BEHAVIORAL MOMENTUM LLC v. AMBROSE et al
as 3:2024cv04734
Plaintiff:
BEHAVIORAL MOMENTUM LLC doing business as THE PUZZLE PLACE
Defendant:
RACHAEL AMBROSE, ANNA MOKRZECKI and WE CARE AUTISM SERVICES., LLC
USA v. Ambrose Sample, II
as 21-1437
Defendant / Appellant:
AMBROSE J. SAMPLE, II
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Alonzo Johnson v. United States of America, et al
as 20-3256
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN D. ASTON, ATTORNEY, UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICE, ROGER A. COX, Attorney and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALONZO LAMAR JOHNSON
Defendant:
SOO C. SONG, TINA MILLER, UNKNOWN GRAND JURY JUDGE and others
USA v. Ambrose Sample, II
as 19-2762
Defendant / Appellant:
AMBROSE J. SAMPLE, II
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Santander Consumer USA, Inc. v. Ambrose et al
as 1:2017cv01599
Plaintiff:
Santander Consumer USA, Inc.
Defendant:
Indira Ambrose and Dillard Honie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201
In re: Gerald Bush
as 16-3353
Petitioner:
In re: GERALD BUSH
Respondent:
COMMISSIONER ANNE MARIE AMBROSE, COMMISSIONER RONITTA BENTON, COMMISSIONER CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Nominal Respondent:
C. DARNELL JONES, II
In re: Alton D. Brown, et al
as 16-2749
Petitioner:
In re: ALTON D. BROWN
Respondent:
GARY L. LANCASTER, J. CURTIS JOYNER, THOMAS J. RUETER and others
Nominal Respondent:
JAMES M. MUNLEY
In re: Alton Brown, et al
as 15-1616
Petitioner:
In re: ALTON D. BROWN
Respondent:
GARY L. LANCASTER, J. CURTIS JOYNER, THOMAS J. RUETER and others
Nominal Respondent:
JAMES M. MUNLEY
In re: Gerald Bush
as 14-4040
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: GERALD BUSH
Defendant - Respondent:
CRAIG B. SOKOLOW, Esquire, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Nominal Respondent:
C. DARNELL JONES, II
In re: In Re: James C. Platts
as 14-3575
Defendant - Petitioner:
In re: JAMES C. PLATTS
Plaintiff - Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Nominal Respondent:
DONETTA W. AMBROSE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
